Paper: GS – III, Subject: Environment and Ecology, Topic: Pollution, Issue: Right to Environmental health.
Context:
India is witnessing a worsening environmental crisis most visibly in the form of severe air pollution in Delhi–NCR, rising climate-induced disasters, and declining ecological health.
Key Takeaways:
- Despite administrative measures like school closures or work-from-home advisories, the response remains reactive rather than rights-based.
- The right to life under Article 21 must be interpreted to include the right to live in a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, with the State bearing primary responsibility for environmental protection rather than shifting the burden to citizens.
Constitutional and Legal Foundations for Environmental Protection in India:

Key Environmental Principles Highlighted:
1. Precautionary Principle:
- Lack of scientific certainty should not delay preventive action.
- Recognized in Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v. Union of India (1996).
2. Polluter Pays Principle:
- Those responsible for pollution must bear the cost of remediation.
- Applied in both civil and criminal liability.
3. Sustainable Development:
- Development that compromises future generations is constitutionally unacceptable.
Public Trust Doctrine:
- State acts as a trustee of natural resources (air, water, forests).
- MC Mehta v. Kamal Nath (1997): Natural resources cannot be transferred for private exploitation.
- Reinforces that environmental protection is not policy discretion but constitutional duty.
Disasters & Environmental Protection:
- During disasters (natural or man-made), environmental protection becomes more critical, not less.
- Administrative excuses like “emergency” cannot justify systemic regulatory failure.
Gaps Highlighted:
- Environmental rights are still judicially evolved, not explicitly guaranteed.
- Weak enforcement despite multiple laws (EPA 1986, NGT Act).
- Over-reliance on short-term executive orders instead of structural reforms.
Way Forward Suggested:
- Explicit recognition of the Right to a Healthy Environment as a constitutional right.
- Stronger judicial enforcement of environmental accountability.
- Shift from crisis management to rights-based governance.
- Clear fixing of responsibility on State agencies rather than moralising citizen behaviour.
Conclusion:
The editorial underscores that environmental degradation is not merely an administrative failure but a constitutional crisis. Recognising the right to a healthy environment as an enforceable facet of Article 21 is essential to uphold human dignity, intergenerational justice, and the rule of law.
La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.
FOLLOW US ON:
◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam
◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS
◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/
GET IN TOUCH:
Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/
or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929, +91 9052 99 2929, +91 9154 24 2140
OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020
Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524, Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081
Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040
