Paper: GS – II, Subject: International Relations, Topic: International institutions, agencies and fora, Issue: Implications of the ICJ ruling.
Context:
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued a landmark advisory opinion reaffirming that states are legally obligated to mitigate climate change. It emphasized the responsibility to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and support vulnerable nations.
Key Highlights:
Legal Significance of ICJ Opinion:
- Moral obligation: Though non-binding, the ruling holds moral and political weight.
- Enables accountability: Countries that ratified international treaties can be held accountable in their domestic courts.
- Aids developing countries: It is especially important for vulnerable island nations to hold high emitters accountable.
- Future Cases: The ICJ reaffirmed the 1.5°C threshold under the Paris Agreement. It leads to cases in the future if countries breach emission limits.
Challenges in Enforcement:
- ICJ ruling could inspire action, but enforcement is doubtful.
- Enforcement requires attributing specific damages to climate change, which is scientifically and legally complex. Historical emissions attribution is difficult.
- Many impacts are amplifications of existing phenomena, not entirely new events.
- Even the Loss and Damage Funds are unlikely to be effective as it depends on voluntary contributions.
- ICJ cannot enforce its decisions without support from other UN bodies. Thus, implementation depends on state cooperation, which is often lacking.
- Many mechanisms were created without equal application to rich and poor countries.
- Western nations often ignore international standards, citing sovereignty. Developed nations are also reluctant to finance reparations.
- The ruling is more useful for moral advocacy than enforcement. It is more symbolic, reinforcing existing obligations.
Probable measures:
- Technological solutions can lead decarbonization in both the West and developing countries.
- Developed countries must be held accountable but developing countries also should not wait for reparations and must invest in technology and resilience on their own.
- Developing countries should focus on self-reliance using their own resources for climate adaptation.
Conclusion:
The ICJ ruling may not compel compensation but it can strengthen global climate discourse. Enforcement will depend on domestic legal systems, international diplomacy, and public pressure.
La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.
FOLLOW US ON:
â—‰ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam
â—‰ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS
â—‰ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/
GET IN TOUCH:
Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/
or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929, +91 9052 99 2929, +91 9154 24 2140
OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020
Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524, Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081
Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040