A compass, not a verdict (Climate Change)

Paper: GS – III, Subject: Environment, Ecology and Disaster Management, Topic: Global agreements and efforts, Issue: Implications of the ICJ verdict on climate change.

Context:

The International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) advisory opinion on climate change, though not legally binding, carries moral and legal weight, prompting debate on state obligations regarding climate change.

Key Highlights:

Background of the Case:

  • The case was initiated by Vanuatu, a Pacific Island nation, supported by over 130 countries seeking clarity on:
  • State obligations under international law for climate change prevention.
  • Legal consequences for harm caused due to climate inaction. 

Take aways from the ICJ Opinion:

  • Climate change as Existential threat: It recognized climate change as existential threat not just morally but also through legal frameworks like:
  • UN treaties,
  • Customary International Law,
  • Law of the Sea,
  • Human Rights.
  • Violations of rights: Climate inaction violates rights to life, health, food, housing. Governments must act using best available science and ambitious climate plans.
  • Legal weight to obligations: Duties to reduce emissions, protect the environment, and cooperate internationally are no longer optional. Failure may invite litigation and enforcement challenges. 

India’s scenario:

Climate Actions Taken:

  • Target: 50% electricity from renewables by 2030.
  • Achievements:
  • Decline in emissions intensity.
  • Growing Afforestation trends.
  • EV policies in metro cities.
  • Initiatives like ISA, LIFE campaign.
  • Development Dilemma:  India still tackling basic needs like electricity, employment, and housing. Though India has historically low per capita emissions, yet it faces pressures to decarbonize.
  • Legal & Policy Gaps:
  • Patchy implementation of pollution laws.
  • Weak compliance across sectors.
  • Need for stronger environmental litigation capacity.
  • Fossil Fuel Subsidies: Are key for rural poor using biomass, kerosene. But ICJ opinion may lead to rethink on such subsidies.

Implications for India:

  • Litigation Risk: International litigation against India could emerge if obligations are unmet.
  • Strengthen Environmental Institutions: National Green Tribunal, compliance bodies must be empowered.
  • Shift from Morality to Law: Environmental duties are now enforceable legal obligations, not moral choices.
  • Reform Subsidies & Improve Access: Focus on clean energy for the poor to reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

Conclusion:

The ICJ opinion is a turning point in global climate jurisprudence. India must balance development and climate justice, address enforcement gaps, and realign policy frameworks with global legal norms.

https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/the-milestone-icj-opinion-on-climate-obligations-is-not-just-a-verdict-from-afar-but-a-compass-10155850

La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.

FOLLOW US ON:

◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam

◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS

◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/

GET IN TOUCH:

Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/

or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929+91 9052 99 2929+91 9154 24 2140

OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020

Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524,  Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081

Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
var s=document.createElement(""script"");s.type=""text/javascript"";s.async=!0;s.src=""https: