Great Nicobar and the Issue of Nature’s Legal Rights

Paper: GS – III, Subject: Environment, Ecology and Disaster Management, Topic: Broad/Overlap, Issue: Legal Rights of nature.

Context:

The Government’s mega project on Great Nicobar (power plant, township, transshipment port, airport) raises the question of granting legal rights to nature to safeguard ecology.

Key Highlights:

Rights of Nature in India:
  • The Great Nicobar issue shows tension between mega-projects and ecological rights. Past examples of environmental legal recognition include:
    • Tehri Dam (Uttarakhand) protests highlight displacement and ecological damage.
    • Sardar Sarovar Dam (Narmada) – prolonged conflict between development and rights of displaced.
Past Judicial Precedents:
  • Niyamgiri Hills case (2013) – Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. vs Ministry of Environment & Forests:
    • Court upheld the rights of Dongria Kondh tribe against bauxite mining.
    • Recognized Gram Sabha’s authority to safeguard culture, religion, and environment under Forest Rights Act, 2006.
    • Similar judicial protection could be extended to Great Nicobar forests.
  • Mohd. Salim vs State of Uttarakhand case:
    • Uttarakhand High Court granted legal personhood to Ganga, Yamuna, Gangotri & Yamunotri glaciers.
    • It assigned responsibilities to guardians.
    • However, the Supreme Court stayed aspects of the ruling due to ambiguity in guardian responsibilities which indicates the need for clearer legal framework on rights of nature.

Global Case studies:

  • Bolivia & Ecuador: Adopted a ‘Rights of Nature’ doctrine, granting legal personhood to ecosystems.
  • New Zealand: Granted legal rights to the Whanganui River.
  • Colombia: 2016 Atrato River case recognised rivers as legal entities with guardianship bodies.
Issues & Challenges:
  • Who speaks for nature? (Guardianship question).
  • Defining legal rights and remedies for natural entities.
  • Balancing development vs conservation in ecologically sensitive regions like islands.
  • Enforcement challenges owing to weak institutional mechanisms for ecological protection.

Conclusion:

India needs to learn from international models and develop a comprehensive legal framework for natural entities in India. It must strengthen community participation and recognize nature as a stakeholder in development planning.

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/great-nicobar-revives-the-issue-of-natures-legal-rights/article70155867.ece

La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.

FOLLOW US ON:

◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam

◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS

◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/

GET IN TOUCH:

Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/

or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929+91 9052 99 2929+91 9154 24 2140

OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020

Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524,  Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081

Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
var s=document.createElement(""script"");s.type=""text/javascript"";s.async=!0;s.src=""https: