Iran’s Nuclear Programme, the illusion of a surgical strike

Paper: GS – II, Subject: International Relations, Topic: Global issues, Issue: Recent strikes on Iran and implications for Iran’s Nuclear Programme.

Context:

Military strikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities and scientists raise the question: Can Iran’s Nuclear Programme be dismantled through military means?

Key Highlights:

Inside Iran’s Nuclear Programme:

  • Strategic Design: Iran has created a militarily resilient nuclear infrastructure.
  • Key Sites:
  • Fordow and Natanz – deeply buried under reinforced concrete and rock.
  • Located inside mountains, e.g., Fordow is 80–100 meters underground.
  • Protection Features: The sites are air-defended with layered systems. Further the use of bunkers makes aerial attacks largely ineffective.
Iranian Nuclear Facilities (Iran’s Nuclear Programme):

Limitations of Military Options Iran’s nuclear sites:

  • Challenges for Conventional Weapons: Even precision-guided munitions like the U.S. GBU-57 MOP (Massive Ordnance Penetrator) may not guarantee complete destruction. MOPs require optimal conditions (e.g., hardened targets at shallow depth).
  • Reconstruction Capability: Iran has demonstrated an ability to quickly rebuild damaged infrastructure (e.g., post-2010 Stuxnet attack).
  • Historical Precedents vs. Iran Case: Though Israel destroyed Iraq’s Osirak reactor (1981) and Syria’s al-Kibar (2007) nuclear sites. Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is spread out, deeply buried, and technologically matured.
  • Integrated facilities: Iran’s nuclear infrastructure is integrated with military-industrial complex and scientific institutions Unlike Syria/Iraq where no visible or centralized “bomb factory” exists.
  • Iranian Deterrence: Iran has warned that military action would provoke a “crushing” retaliation and demonstrated capabilities through regional allies and missile/drone strikes.
  • Cycle of Escalation: Bombing Iran could escalate into a “forever war” cycle of tit-for-tat.

A Better Alternative:

  • Reviving JCPOA: 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action curbed Iran’s uranium enrichment. U.S. exit under Trump weakened the deal though recent talks have aimed to restore terms.
  • IAEA Monitoring: Iran continues to allow inspections under IAEA. Current enrichment levels (up to 60%) are still below weapons-grade (90%).
  • Pragmatic approach: Diplomacy, verification, economic sanctions, and regional cooperation offer a more sustainable approach.

Conclusion:

Iran’s nuclear programme is a hardened, dispersed, and resilient system. A surgical military strike is unlikely to fully dismantle it and could backfire strategically. For international peace and stability, reviving diplomacy and multilateral agreements like the JCPOA is crucial.

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/irans-n-programme-the-illusion-of-a-surgical-strike/article69728594.ece

La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.

FOLLOW US ON:

◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam

◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS

◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/

GET IN TOUCH:

Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/

or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929+91 9052 99 2929+91 9154 24 2140

OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020

Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524,  Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081

Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
var s=document.createElement(""script"");s.type=""text/javascript"";s.async=!0;s.src=""https: