Freebies vs Welfare Measures: SC Raises Concerns

Paper: GS – II, Subject: Polity, Topic: Judiciary, Issue: Freebies vs Welfare Measures.

Context:

The Supreme Court has expressed strong disapproval of state governments distributing freebies without proper differentiation between the affluent and the underprivileged.

  • The court raised concerns about the potential “appeasement” policies that may be in place, especially ahead of elections.

Key Takeaways:

Legal Context:

  • The remarks came during a hearing related to a writ petition filed by Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Corporation Limited (TNPDCL), challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 23 of the Electricity (Amendment) Act, 2024.
  • TNPDCL argued that the financial gap in the electricity sector has significantly widened, leading to unsustainable burdens on the public exchequer.
Understanding The Freebies vs Welfare Measures Debate

Constitutional & Institutional Framework:

Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP):

  • Articles 38, 39 & 41 promote welfare state principles.
  • Direct the State to ensure social, economic justice & public welfare.
  • Non-justiciable, but form moral – political basis of welfare schemes

Supreme Court’s View:

  • Expressed concern over irrational freebies causing fiscal instability.
  • Warned of potential economic disaster.
  • Suggested formation of an expert body to examine and regulate the issue.

Challenges of Excessive Freebies:

  • Fiscal Stress: Rising debt; Punjab ranked lowest (Fiscal Health Index 2025).
  • Dependency Culture: Reduces work incentive (e.g., labour shortage concerns).
  • Competitive Populism: States copy each other (free electricity schemes).
  • Distorted Spending: Cuts funds for infra, health, education.
  • Environmental Damage: Free power – groundwater overuse (Punjab, Haryana).

Way Forward:

  • Amend Representation of the People Act (RPA): Regulate manifesto promises; disclose funding source.
  • Fiscal Cap:  Limit freebies to % of GSDP/tax revenue.
  • Empower ECI: Regulate manifestos; introduce Model Manifesto.
  • Voter Awareness: Demand fiscal transparency.

The Supreme Court urged states to reassess welfare policies, stressing responsible governance over electoral populism, and highlighting equitable resource distribution, infrastructure development, fiscal discipline, and long-term sustainable public welfare.

Source: (The Indian Express, The Hindu)

La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2026 preparation.

FOLLOW US ON:

â—‰ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam

â—‰ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS

â—‰ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/

GET IN TOUCH:

Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/

or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929+91 9052 99 2929+91 9154 24 2140

OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020

Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524,  Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081

Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top