Paper: GS – II, Subject: Polity, Topic: Judiciary, Issue: Impeachment of Judges.
Context:
Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla has admitted a motion signed by 146 MPs to remove Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court and has formed a three-member inquiry committee to investigate the charges against him.
Key Takeaways:
- Inquiry Committee Formed: A three-member inquiry committee has been constituted to probe the charges against Justice Varma.
- The committee comprises:
- Supreme Court Judge Justice Aravind Kumar
- Madras High Court Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
- Senior Karnataka High Court advocate B.V. Acharya
- Background: The motion follows the repatriation of Justice Varma from the Delhi High Court to the Allahabad High Court after burnt currency notes were found at his official residence.
- An in-house inquiry by the Supreme Court had reportedly indicted Justice Varma.
- Pending Proposal: The proposal for the removal of Justice Varma will remain pending until the inquiry committee submits its report.

Constitutional Provision for Impeachment of Judges:
- While the constitution does not use the word ‘impeachment’, it is colloquially used to refer to the proceedings under Article 124 for the removal of a Supreme Court judge.
- The removal of High Court judges is governed by Article 217(1)(b) and Article 218 of the Constitution of India.
- These articles provide that a judge of a High Court may be removed only by an order of the President of India, based on a motion passed by both Houses of Parliament
- Legal Framework: The process is detailed in the Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968, which provides the following steps:
- Initiation of Motion: A motion for removal must be signed by at least 100 Lok Sabha MPs or 50 Rajya Sabha MPs.
- Formation of Inquiry Committee: Once admitted, the presiding officer constitutes a three-member committee comprising:
- The Chief Justice of India or a Supreme Court judge,
- A Chief Justice of a High Court,
- A distinguished jurist.
- Investigation: The committee investigates the charges and submits a report.
- Parliamentary Procedure: If the committee finds the judge guilty of misbehaviour or incapacity, each House of Parliament must pass the removal motion by a special majority (a two-thirds majority of members present and voting, and a majority of the total membership of the House).
- Final Decision: The final order for removal is passed by the President of India.
Safeguard to Ensure Judicial Accountability:

Conclusion:
The Justice Varma case underscores the urgent need to enact the Judicial Standards and Accountability Bill to institutionalize transparency, enforce ethical standards, and establish a robust mechanism for holding judges accountable while preserving judicial independence and public trust in the judiciary.
La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.
FOLLOW US ON:
â—‰ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam
â—‰ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS
â—‰ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/
GET IN TOUCH:
Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/
or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929, +91 9052 99 2929, +91 9154 24 2140
OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020
Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524, Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081
Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040