Tribunals were created as specialized, quasi-judicial bodies to deliver fast, expert and cost-effective justice outside regular courts. Since their constitutional recognition (Arts. 323A–B) and statutory enactments, tribunals aimed at easing judicial burden.
Role of Tribunals in reforming judicial system:
- Specialisation: Tribunals such as the NCLT, NGT, ITAT and TDSAT have brought domain expertise to complex matters (company law, environment, tax, telecom), improving quality and speed of decision-making.
- Reduction of Court load: By handling specialised disputes, tribunals have reduced pressure on regular courts, helping decongest dockets and enabling judges to focus on constitutional and civil/criminal backlogs.
- Cost-effective justice: Tribunals operate informally (not bound by CPC/Evidence Act) and often dispose matters quicker than higher courts, beneficial in technical/commercial disputes.
- Judicial Innovations: NGT provides environmental remedies such as interim relief, compensation that traditional courts struggled to operationalise rapidly.
- Rationalisation initiative: The Tribunal Reforms (2021) consolidated tribunals (approx. reduced from 26 → 19) to remove overlap and streamline administration.
Major challenges undermining tribunal success:
- Executive control: Appointments, service conditions and removals largely lie with the executive. The Supreme Court in Rojer Mathew (2019) flagged defects such as short fixed tenures and potential re-appointment bias.
- Separation-of-powers friction: The Chandra Kumar (1997) judgment affirmed High Court supervision over tribunals, creating uncertainty about finality and leading to repeated judicial interventions.
- Pendency & vacancies: Many tribunals suffer chronic vacancies and backlogs, defeating the speed objective. For example, the Armed Forces Tribunal pendency is at 18,800.
- Overlapping jurisdiction: Multiple bodies with similar or intersecting mandates caused inconsistency and litigation over proper forums.
- Capacity gaps: Technical members often lack legal training while procedural heterogeneity across tribunals creates unpredictability for litigants.
Reforms needed:
- Statutory National Tribunal Commission to secure merit-based appointments, uniform standards, fixed tenures and insulation from executive pressure.
- Judicial-executive balance: Selection panels must include judiciary leadership (CJI or nominee) and independent experts, respecting the safeguards enshrined in Rojer Mathew case.
- Timely recruitment: Fill vacancies; train technical members in adjudicatory law; create pan-India benches where demand exists.
- Clear appellate architecture: Limit frivolous High Court interference while preserving judicial review for law and jurisdiction.
Conclusion:
Structural reforms, ensuring independence, capacity and clear institutional design will convert tribunals from partial fixes into a sustainable pillar of India’s justice delivery system.
‘+1’ Value Addition:
- Tribunals like CAT, NGT, and NCLT provide quicker, expert adjudication. For e.g., NGT has disposed of over 35,000 cases since 2010.
- With over 4.5 crore cases pending in Indian courts (NJDG, 2024), tribunals ease judicial burden.
- SC in Rojer Mathew v. South Indian Bank, 2019 struck down provisions of Tribunal appointment rules as they violate judicial primacy.
- Over 240 tribunal posts remain vacant while 4-year terms discourage experts from joining tribunals, delaying justice delivery.
La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2025 preparation.
FOLLOW US ON:
◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam
◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS
◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/
GET IN TOUCH:
Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/
or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929, +91 9052 99 2929, +91 9154 24 2140
OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020
Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524, Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081
Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

