Introduction
Large Language Models (LLMs) require vast and diverse textual datasets to develop linguistic competence, factual understanding and contextual reasoning. However, the mass digitisation of books for AI training creates tensions among technological innovation, authors’ rights, transparency and preservation of cultural heritage.
Need for AI Training Data
- Books provide curated, long-form and domain-specific knowledge that improves an LLM’s accuracy, reasoning and linguistic diversity.
- Multilingual and regional literature can reduce the dominance of English-centric data and make AI systems socially inclusive.
- However, indiscriminate data acquisition cannot be justified merely by the scale required for training.
Scanning Methods and Preservation
- Non-destructive scanning uses overhead cameras or specialised book scanners without unbinding the book. It protects rare manuscripts but is slower and costlier.
- Destructive scanning removes bindings and scans individual pages rapidly. Though efficient for mass digitisation, it may permanently destroy physical books, including out-of-print and historically valuable editions.
- Digital copies also cannot fully preserve paper, annotations, bindings and provenance that carry historical meaning.
Copyright and Transparency Concerns
- Copyrighted works may be copied without the author’s consent, licensing or remuneration.
- Whether AI training constitutes “fair dealing” remains legally contested, especially when models generate content resembling protected works.
- Authors may lose bargaining power while technology firms derive commercial benefits from their creations.
- Secret training datasets prevent rights-holders from identifying unauthorised use and obstruct independent scrutiny.
- Conversely, overly restrictive rules may benefit large publishers, raise entry barriers and hinder research and Indian-language AI development.
Cultural Preservation Concerns
- Digitisation can preserve fragile texts, improve access and revive marginalised languages.
- Yet commercial selection may privilege popular works while excluding oral traditions, regional literature and community-controlled knowledge.
- Decontextualised extraction may misrepresent indigenous knowledge and facilitate cultural appropriation.
Way Forward
- Mandate dataset disclosure, provenance records and independent audits.
- Develop transparent licensing, collective remuneration and opt-out mechanisms.
- Prefer non-destructive scanning for rare works and deposit preservation-quality copies in public repositories.
- Apply consent and benefit-sharing principles to indigenous knowledge.
- Promote public, multilingual and ethically curated datasets.
Conclusion
AI innovation and cultural rights are not mutually exclusive. A transparent, licensed and preservation-oriented framework can convert digitisation into a public good without treating authors or cultural heritage merely as raw data.
Source: (The Indian Express, The Hindu, Live Mint)
La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2026 preparation.
FOLLOW US ON:
◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam
◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS
◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/
GET IN TOUCH:
Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/
or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929, +91 9052 99 2929, +91 9154 24 2140
OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020
Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524, Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081
Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040
AI Copyright: Balancing LLM Training and Culture