On financial devolution among States

Syllabus: GS-II

Subject: Polity

Topic: Federalism ,

Issue: Financial relation

Southern state have raised issue of not receiving proper share in financial devolution:

  • Divisible pool of taxes are defined in article 270 of constitution divided as per recommendation of Finance Commission(Article 280)

 /></p><p><strong>Key issues</strong></p><ul><li>Around 23% of Union government’s gross tax receipts are collected through Cess and surcharge, not shared with states.</li><li>Variations exist in the amount each state receives back for every rupee contributed to central taxes. (Due to headquarter of corporations in few State capitals.)</li><li>Higher weightage for equity and needs over efficiency.</li><li>Grants-in-aid recommended by FCs vary among states, is based on population and area.</li></ul><p><strong>The way ahead:</strong></p><ul><li><strong>Enlarge the divisible pool</strong> by including a portion of Cess and surcharge, while gradually discontinuing various impositions to rationalize tax slabs.</li><li><strong>Increase weightage</strong> for efficiency criteria in horizontal devolution,</li><li>Considering <strong>relative GST contributions</strong> from states.</li><li>a more formal arrangement for states’ participation in the constitution and working of the Finance Commission, akin to the GST council.</li><li>States should devolve adequate resources to local bodies for vibrant and accountable development, furthering the balance between equity and federalism.</li></ul><table style=Prelims connect( meaning of different term used in Finance Commission formula)

·         Income distance’ is the distance of a State’s income from the State with highest per capita income which is Haryana.

·          ‘Population’ is the population as per the 2011 Census.(from 15th FC)

·         ‘Forest and ecology’ consider the share of dense forest of each State in the aggregate dense forest of all the States.

·         ‘The demographic performance’ criterion has been introduced to reward efforts made by States in controlling their population.

·         ‘Tax effort’ as a criterion has been used to reward States with higher tax collection efficiency.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
var s=document.createElement(""script"");s.type=""text/javascript"";s.async=!0;s.src=""https: