IAS / IPS

Civil Services

LAEX IAS Jr.

Jr. Foundation

Inter

+ IIT-JEE / NEET

Inter

+ IAS / CUET

Inter

+ CLAT / IPMAT

CLAT / IPMAT

Entrance Prep

Pre Schools

Early Learning

Schools

Academic Excellence

Colleges

Higher Education

The Centre-states tussle over Mines and Minerals Bill (Indian Express)

Paper: GS-II, Subject: Polity, Topic: Federalism, Issue: Mines and Minerals Bill, 2026 and State Taxation Powers

Context

Recently, Parliament passed the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026. Mineral-rich States have opposed its restrictions on their taxation powers, raising concerns about revenue loss and fiscal federalism.

Mineral Royalty & Fiscal Federalism
(Mines and Minerals Bill)

Explanation

Key developments

  • In Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India, 2024, the Supreme Court held that royalty is not a tax.
  • It recognised the States’ power to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing land under Entries 50 and 49 of the State List.
  • The 2026 Bill permits State taxes and cesses only under conditions or restrictions prescribed by the Central Government.
  • It also invalidates unpaid or unrecovered past demands, while protecting amounts already collected by State governments.

Centre’s rationale

  • Multiple and non-uniform State levies can create an unpredictable fiscal burden and discourage investment in mining.
  • Higher extraction costs can make coal, iron ore and limestone expensive, raising infrastructure costs and contributing to inflation.
  • A uniform framework can provide certainty, stability and predictability to mining companies and support domestic mineral production.

Concerns of States

  • Mineral-rich States depend considerably on royalty, cesses and other mining revenue for development and welfare expenditure.
  • They also bear local costs such as displacement, deforestation, pollution, land degradation and pressure on public infrastructure.
  • Restricting taxes on mineral-bearing land may affect State powers under Entry 49, which Parliament cannot ordinarily limit through mineral regulation.
  • Leaving important taxation conditions to Central rules may also raise concerns about excessive delegation and reduced State autonomy.

Way forward

  • The Centre should frame transparent fiscal limits after meaningful consultation with mineral-producing States.
  • A predictable taxation system must ensure fair compensation for environmental damage and mining-affected communities.

Conclusion

The Bill seeks national uniformity and investment certainty but may weaken State fiscal autonomy. A framework based on cooperative federalism, constitutional balance and equitable revenue-sharing is essential for sustainable mineral development.

Source: (The Indian Express)

La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2026 preparation.

FOLLOW US ON:

◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam

◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS

◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/

GET IN TOUCH:

Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/

or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929+91 9052 99 2929+91 9154 24 2140

OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020

Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524,  Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081

Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top