IAS / IPS

Civil Services

LAEX IAS Jr.

Jr. Foundation

Inter

+ IAS / CUET

Inter

+ CLAT / IPMAT

CLAT / IPMAT

Entrance Prep

Pre Schools

Early Learning

Schools

Academic Excellence

Colleges

Higher Education

In India, voting cannot remain merely a statutory right (The Hindu)

Paper: GS – II, Subject: Polity, Topic: Rights issues, Issue: Voting Rights in India (Right to Vote).

Context:

In a democracy, the vote is not just a paper choice; it is the citizen’s share in sovereignty. Recently, the demand to recognise voting as a fundamental right has revived the debate on whether India’s most basic democratic act can remain only a statutory right.

Key Takeaways:

Background: Right to Vote in India

Explanation:

Traditional Legal Position:

  • In N.P. Ponnuswami case (1952), the Supreme Court held that election rights are not common law rights but rights created by statute.
  • In Jyoti Basu case (1982), the Court stated that the right to elect is neither a fundamental right nor a common law right, but only a statutory right.
  • In Kuldip Nayar case (2006), the Court again held that the individual right to vote flows mainly from election laws.

Constitutionalisation of Voting:

  • Later judgments slowly expanded the constitutional meaning of voting.
  • In Association for Democratic Reforms case (2002), the Court recognised voters’ right to know the criminal, educational and financial background of candidates as part of freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a).
  • In PUCL case (2003), the Court held that freedom of voting means freedom to make an informed choice.
  • In the NOTA judgment (2013), the Court held that the right to reject candidates is also part of political expression.

Present Debate:

  • A paradox exists because the voter’s right to know, secrecy of ballot and right to reject are constitutionally protected, but the act of voting itself is still treated as statutory.
  • Since democracy cannot function without voters, the core right of an eligible citizen to participate in elections deserves stronger constitutional protection.
  • However, all procedural details of voting need not become fundamental rights. Parliament can still regulate qualifications, disqualifications, electoral rolls and election procedures.

Conclusion:

Voting is the instrument through which “We, the People” renew democratic legitimacy. Therefore, while procedural regulation may remain statutory, the citizen’s core entitlement to vote deserves constitutional protection.

Source: (The Hindu)

La Excellence IAS Academy, the best IAS coaching in Hyderabad, known for delivering quality content and conceptual clarity for UPSC 2026 preparation.

FOLLOW US ON:

◉ YouTube : https://www.youtube.com/@CivilsPrepTeam

◉ Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/LaExcellenceIAS

◉ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/laexcellenceiasacademy/

GET IN TOUCH:

Contact us at info@laex.in, https://laex.in/contact-us/

or Call us @ +91 9052 29 2929+91 9052 99 2929+91 9154 24 2140

OUR BRANCHES:
Head Office: H No: 1-10-225A, Beside AEVA Fertility Center, Ashok Nagar Extension, VV Giri Nagar, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad, 500020

Madhapur: Flat no: 301, survey no 58-60, Guttala begumpet Madhapur metro pillar: 1524,  Rangareddy Hyderabad, Telangana 500081

Bangalore: Plot No: 99, 2nd floor, 80 Feet Road, Beside Poorvika Mobiles, Chandra Layout, Attiguppe, Near Vijaya Nagara, Bengaluru, 560040

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top